Skip to main content
European Anti-Fraud Office
Report fraud

List of rulings of the Court of Justice of the EU concerning OLAF

 

The list presented below is purely informative and has no legal value.

1.     OLAF’s mandate and independence

C-11/00, Commission v ECB
C-15/00, Commission v EIB
F-89/11, Goetz v Committee of the Regions
T 483/13, Oikonomopoulos v Commission
T-399/17, Dalli v Commission

2.    Investigations 

A.    Opening, closure and dismissal

T-166/17, EKETA v Commission
T-198/17, EKETA v Commission
T-399/17, Dalli v Commission
T-658/17, Stichting Against Child Trafficking v Commission
T-738/18, Dragnea v Commission

B.    Internal investigations

F-23/05, Giraudy v Commission
T-48/05, Franchet and Byk v Commission
F-124/05 and F-96/06 - A and G v Commission
T-241/09, Nikolaou v Court of Auditors
C-220/13 P, Nikolaou v Court of Auditors
T-166/16, Panzeri v European Parliament
T-399/17, Dalli v Commission
C-591/19 P - Commission v De Esteban Alonso

C.    External investigations

T-483/13, Oikonomopoulos v Commission
T-29/15, IMG v Commission
T-47/16, Sigma Orionis v REA
T-48/16, Sigma Orionis v Commission
T-617/17, Vialto Consulting v Commission 

D.    Procedural rights and guarantees

T-259/03, Nikolaou v Commission
T-447/11, Catinis v Commission
T-86/17, Le Pen v Commission
T-161/17, Le Pen v Commission
C-628/19 P, Szegedi v European Parliament

3.    Public access to documents

T-391/03 and T-70/04, Franchet and Byk v Commission
T-221/08, Strack v Commission
T-110/15, IMG v Commission

4.    Legal proceedings

T-215/02, Gómez-Reino v Commission
T-29/03, Comunidad Autónoma de Andalucía v Commission
T-96/03, Camós Grau v Commission
T-309/03, Camós Grau v Commission
T-193/04, Tillack v Commission
T-4/05, Strack v Commission
T-48/05, Franchet and Byk v Commission
T-261/09 P, Commission v Violetti and others
T-690/13, In vivo v Commission
T-289/16, Inox Mare v Commission
T-631/16, Remag Metallhandel and Jaschinsky v Commission
T-399/17, Dalli v Commission
T-658/17, Stichting Against Child Trafficking v Commission
C-831/18 P, Commission v RQ